Cross-platform experience assurance
One journey.
Every surface.
Verify that selected platforms deliver the same intended customer experience—with synchronized evidence developers can act on.
Before Parity
The journey is shared.
The tests are not.
Four capable test stacks can all pass independently—and still deliver four subtly different experiences.
No shared product-state contract
Execution tools know how to operate a platform. They do not automatically prove that every platform reached an equivalent business state with equivalent controls, content, and accessibility.
A precise comparison
Useful tools.
Different responsibility.
Excellent execution engines, but the same journey is often rewritten and maintained for each platform.
Detect visual change, but may not know whether platforms reached equivalent product states or intentionally different layouts.
Essential for exploratory judgment, but expensive and difficult to repeat consistently across every build and surface.
Accelerate authoring, but commonly produce tests for one platform or repository without a durable cross-platform experience contract.
Models one product journey, delegates execution to platform adapters, and verifies equivalent implementation with synchronized evidence.
Parity complements existing automation and human QA; it adds the cross-platform assurance layer between product intent and platform execution.
Working prototype: one registered contract
Describe what the customer should experience.
Today’s vertical slice stores one reviewed Intent journey as logical intent—not duplicated selectors or coordinates.
Open application
A platform adapter decides how.
Application ready
Workers synchronize on business state.
Ask Sia is visible
Controls and accessibility are required.
Reasoned exceptions
Platform differences are explicit, governed, and expirable.
Prerequisite: make the application testable
Artifact-first does not mean zero-integration.
Source access is optional. Runtime replay is mandatory before a discovered mapping is trusted.
First-run onboarding: configure launch details → discover targets incrementally → review ambiguity → replay → save verified mappings with build provenance.
The assurance pipeline
From human intent to evidence-backed finding.
Functional test
Assertions run and evidence is saved for later.
Consistency test
Compatible states unlock cross-platform findings.
Historical comparison
Reuse compatible prior evidence with visible provenance.
Prototype boundary: the localhost demo executes a named-control presence check with screenshots. Rich canonical-tree alignment and historical comparison are implemented as core packages but are not the live customer-issue demo shown today.
Same checkpoint, four surfaces
Parity verifies meaning before pixels.
Live demo: Android, mWeb, and Web. Target architecture: native trees and browser accessibility trees become a canonical model; iOS requires a compatible macOS/Xcode worker and remains unvalidated in this local demo.
Extensible contract roadmap
Test the experience—not just the element.
Coupon and checkout
Was the coupon applied? Do discount, total, currency, and success copy agree?
Login and onboarding
Did every platform reach the intended destination with the same required choices and next actions?
Form validation
Are required errors equivalent? Is Submit enabled only when the form becomes valid?
Search and navigation
Do equivalent queries, filters, tabs, and back actions lead to the same product state?
Loading, empty, and error states
Are status messages, retry actions, and fallback paths present and meaningfully equivalent?
Inclusive interaction
Compare roles, labels, focusability, order, target size, and success or error announcements.
Implemented live flow: one registered customer issue—after onboarding, verify whether Ask Sia is present. The examples above are planned contract types enabled incrementally; they are not all available in the current localhost UI.
Platform-native does not mean inconsistent
Same outcome.
Approved native expression.
INTENT · share_item
Customer can share the selected item
The contract requires the outcome and an accessible action—not one identical component everywhere.
Different UI, approved equivalent outcome.
Restriction has reason, owner, alternative, and expiry.
No outcome, no approved alternative, or inaccessible fallback.
No majority vote: Android, iOS, or Web is never automatically “truth.” The experience contract and recorded product decision define what is acceptable.
Target comparison model
Compare like with like—or say “incomparable.”
Equivalent fixture, environment, build policy, and business state
A missing Web control becomes a confirmed implementation difference.
Login failed, stale fixture, wrong experiment, or incompatible build
Parity reports an evidence problem—not a product inconsistency.
Target report shape
Every finding carries its proof.
Illustrative finding UI-CONTROL-001
Ask Sia is missing on Web
Android, iOS, and mWeb expose the required floating action at control_verified. Web reached the same product state but has no equivalent accessible control.
Difference table
All platforms reached application ready.
Missing on Web; present elsewhere.
No equivalent Web role or label found.
Advisory only; native and responsive layouts may differ.
High—semantic and screenshot evidence agree.
Working today + Sunday integration
English speech works today.
Local-language translation lands Sunday.
Hackathon-day target: Hindi demo: “एप्लिकेशन खोलें। जाँच करें कि आस्क सिया दिखाई दे रहा है।” → detected language → reviewed English. Sarvam credentials stay server-side; provider failure returns safely to the working English/typed path.
Not just a report
A governed feedback loop.
Today Parity reports; it does not silently rewrite product code.
The current prototype produces evidence and suggested remediation. Repository-aware proposals, human-bound approval, replay, and governed accepted differences are the target feedback loop.
Sunday demo script · one supported journey
Show the complete trust boundary.
Speak in Hindi when Sarvam is connected
एप्लिकेशन खोलें।
जाँच करें कि आस्क सिया दिखाई दे रहा है।
Expected English: Open the application. Verify that Ask Sia is visible.
Disclosure: the current prototype supports this one registered customer-issue journey. The hosted WebM recordings show a voice-driven UI flow but intentionally contain no microphone audio.
Parity
Stop asking whether every test passed.
Ask whether every customer received the intended experience.
One journey · selected platforms · synchronized proof · conscious decisions